Dusht Daman Jee were a Monarch and NOT a Rishi

I have heard many Nihangs say that Dusht Daman(Guru Gobind Singh jee's previous life) were a Rishi but it is not correct Guru jee were a MONARCH. 

Have a read of this excellent article

[tisarpanth.blogspot.in]

Are you insinuating Guru Sahib was a servant of Durga ?

If what you say is true why did Guru Gobind Singh Sahib JI scold the Brahmins who were making sacrifices to Durga when the Mughals were man handling them? Why did Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji scold the Brahimns for sacrificing goats to Durga ( jhatka?

Sukhdeep Singh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are you insinuating Guru Sahib was a servant of
> Durga ?


Did u even read the article i posted?

Quote

This time she pleads with Dusht-Daman to protect her.

Dusht Daman Jee did bhagti at Hemkunt Sahib, became one with God and durga came to him for help.

If we believe Dusht Daman jee were a Rishi, that means he meditated on vedaas and the hindu trinity which cannot be true. So Dusht Daman were a monarch who got a bit udaas from the royal lifetyle and started doing bhagti, became one with God and helped durga when she pleaded for help.

You seem to be insinuating that Dusht Daman ( Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji in a previous life) was a servant of Durga and he made a promise that in Kaljug he will fulllfill his duties to her. You are taking Bachitar Natak to literal and , out of its context, and creating dubhida. In Bachitar Natak, Guru Sahib is clear in his mission which was to destroy tyranny and spread the fragrance of Naam. This mission was passed on to him from Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji. Guru Sahib has no relation to Durga.

Sukhdeep Singh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You seem to be insinuating that Dusht Daman ( Sri
> Guru Gobind Singh Ji in a previous life) was a
> servant of Durga and he made a promise that in
> Kaljug he will fulllfill his duties to her. You
> are taking Bachitar Natak to literal and , out of
> its context, and creating dubhida. In Bachitar
> Natak, Guru Sahib is clear in his mission which
> was to destroy tyranny and spread the fragrance of
> Naam. This mission was passed on to him from Sri
> Guru Nanak Dev Ji. Guru Sahib has no relation to
> Durga.

When did i say that? Did u read the article i posted properly?
Read it again
[tisarpanth.blogspot.in]

There are 2 tales in this article. One tale tells that Dusht Damam were a Rishi and the other tale in which Dusht Daman were a Monarch.
The first tale is false because it says that Dust Daman had only 1 parent who manifested Dusht Daman for the help of Durga.
But in Bachitar Natak, Guru jee says that in his past life, his parents meditated for his union with God.
In the second tale, Dusht Daman is shown as a Monarch who meditated and became one with God. Durga approached him and pleaded for help.
Dusht Daman helped her but nowhere its written that he was a servant of Durga.

There is nothing to be learned from that blogspot. The people have a Sanatan agenda and have no real interest in Tatt Gurmat. You or the author of that blogspot is taking Bachitar Natak out of its context. Sri Guru Gobind SIngh Ji did not help Durga in any life. Bhai Lehna Ji was a servant of Durga before getting initiated into Gurmat. When initiated in Gurmat he noticed how Durga was a servant of Guru Sahib who swept the Gurus floors. Having sangat of jot vigasi Gurmukhs like Bhai Jodh JI Bhai Lehna transformed his life from doing karam kand to doing Gurmat Kamai. Its not such a good idea to promote this sanatan ideology you are only marking marks on your soul. I have nothing else to say on this matter. Best of luck

jhujhar singh ji

In Bachitar Natak Guru sahib does not say anything about Dusht Daman. That is what s sikh should follow. Why to create an issue when there none.

If i am not mistaken God mentioned in vedas is not trinity but formless.

Inder singh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> jhujhar singh ji
>
> In Bachitar Natak Guru sahib does not say anything
> about Dusht Daman. That is what s sikh should
> follow. Why to create an issue when there none.
>
> If i am not mistaken God mentioned in vedas is not
> trinity but formless.

Bhai Sahib Jee
In Bachitar Natak, Guru jee does mention about his previous life.

Jhujhar singh ji

Guru sahib writes about having meditated at Hemkunt
And achieved oneness with God. But he does not mention
About Dusht Daman in Bachitar Natak.

It was Kavi santokh singh who mentions about dusht daman

Inder singh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jhujhar singh ji
>
> Guru sahib writes about having meditated at
> Hemkunt
> And achieved oneness with God. But he does not
> mention
> About Dusht Daman in Bachitar Natak.
>
> It was Kavi santokh singh who mentions about dusht
> daman

Bhai Sahib Jee

The previous life of Guru Gobind Singh jee is also associated with Sarbloh Granth Jee.
Guru Gobind Singh Jee completed Sarbloh Granth at Hazur Sahib where He collected some sanskrit sutras from a family and completed the Sarbloh Granth. Please read this:

[www.manglacharan.com]

So Khalsa knew about Guru Sahib's previous life from 1708 AD only when Guru Sahib collected these sanskrit sutras.

Jhujhar singh ji

In bachitra Natak Guru sahib has defined a devta

ਸਾਧ ਕਰਮ ਜੇ ਪੁਰਖ ਕਮਾਵੈ ॥ ਨਾਮ ਦੇਵਤਾ ਜਗਤ ਕਹਾਵੈ ॥
साध करम जे पुरख कमावै ॥ नाम देवता जगत कहावै ॥
Because of virtuous actions, a purusha (person) is known as devta (god)

ਕੁਕ੍ਰਿਤ ਕਰਮ ਜੇ ਜਗ ਮੈ ਕਰਹੀ ॥ ਨਾਮ ਅਸੁਰ ਤਿਨ ਕੋ ਸਭ ਧਰਹੀ ॥੧੫॥
कुक्रित करम जे जग मै करही ॥ नाम असुर तिन को सभ धरही ॥१५॥
And because of evil actions, he is known as asura (demon).15.

Bachitra Natak

Very good quote Bhai Inder Singh jee, defining Devta and Asur.

Kulbir Singh

ਭਾਈ ਜੁਝਾਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ, ਤੁਸਾਂ ਨੂ ਇਹ ਸੇਧ ਲੈਣੀ ਚਾਹੀਦੀ ਹੈ ਕਿ, ਖਾਲੀ ਭਾਂਡਾ ਬਜਦਾ ਹੀ ਰਿਹੰਦਾ ਹੈ 'ਤੇ ਭਰੀ ਗਾਗਰ ਤਲ ਤੇ ਸ੍ਥਿਰ ਹੋ ਜਾਂਦੀ ਹੈ |
ਬ੍ਲਾਗ ਵਾਲੀ ਸਾਖਿਯਾਂ ਦੀ ਫ੍ਰੋਲਾ-ਫਰਾਲੀ ਵਿਚੋ ਕੁਜ ਨਹੀ ਲਭਣਾ | ਨਾਮੁ ਵਸੇਗਾ ਤਾਂ ਅਰ੍ਥ ਸਹਿਜੇ ਹੀ ਹੋ ਜਾਣੇ ਨੇ |
ਸਾਖਿਯਾਂ ਦਾ ਸਵਾਦ ਘਟਾਓ 'ਤੇ ਨਾਮੁ ਦਾ ਰੱਸ ਵਧਾਓ |