Some good Work by Pinderpal S !!

[www.facebook.com]

Listen to this audio.

Bh Pinderpal Singh did some good work. I am not sure who is this judge.

ਏਦਾ ਬੇੜਾ ਗਰਕ ਹੋ ਗਿਆ || ਇਹ ਓਹ ਲੋਕ ਨੇ ਜੋ ਆਪ ਤੇ ਕੁਝ ਕਰਨ ਜੋਗੇ ਹੈ ਨਹੀਂ ਤੇ ਕਿਸੇ ਨੂੰ ਕਰਦੇ ਵੇਖ ਕੇ ਜਰਦੇ ਨੀ || ਹੋਰ ਕੁਝ ਹਲ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੁਣ, ਏਨਾ ਨੂੰ ਛਿਤਰਾਂ ਦੀ ਲੋੜ ਹੈ || ਨਾਮ ਨੂੰ ਮੰਨਣ ਵਾਲਿਓ ਹੁਣ ਟੈਮ ਹੈ, ਜੋ ਥੋੜੇ ਬਹੁਤੇ ਆਪਿਸ ਵਿਚ ਫ਼ਰਕ ਹਨ ਓਹਨਾ ਨੂੰ ਛੱਡ ਕੇ ਇਕਠੇ ਹੋ ਜਾਵੋ ਤੇ ਏਨਾ ਦੇ ਦਵਾਲੇ ਹੋ ਜਾਓ || ਸਮੇ ਦੀ ਇਹ ਹੀ ਲੋੜ ਹੈ ||

Bhul Chuk Maaf !!

Why are they acting as if only the AKJ do Simran? They keep saying that he is trying to please the AKJ in the audience, but they are not the only ones that do Simran.
Also, they reference one line of Gurbani saying ।ਰਾਮੁਰਾਮੁਕਰਤਾਸਭੁਜਗੁਫਿਰੈਰਾਮੁਨਪਾਇਆਜਾਇ।, and yet they ignore the thousands of lines that say to do Simran. Not to mention that the line they are referencing is taken out of context. If seen with context, you can see it says:
।ਰਾਮੁਰਾਮੁਕਰਤਾਸਭੁਜਗੁਫਿਰੈਰਾਮੁਨਪਾਇਆਜਾਇ।
।ਅਗਮੁਅਗੋਚਰੁਅਤਿਵਡਾਅਤੁਲੁਨਤੁਲਿਆਜਾਇ।
The second line shows that ਰਾਮੁਨਪਾਇਆਜਾਇ is referring to not being able to obtain the value of God's name, similar to how in Rehras Guru Ji says:
।ਸਾਚੇਨਾਮਕੀਤਿਲੁਵਡਿਆਈ।
।ਆਖਿਥਕੇਕੀਮਤਿਨਹੀਪਾਈ।
।ਜੇਸਭਿਮਿਲਿਕੈਆਖਣਪਾਹਿ।
।ਵਡਾਨਹੋਵੈਘਾਟਿਨਜਾਇ॥੨।
Saying this doesn't mean that Guru Ji said we shouldn't do Simran, it just says that God's value isn't dependent on whether or not we do Simran or not (He is great regardless). Also keep in mind that the first line of this Shabad says ।ਆਖਾਜੀਵਾਵਿਸਰੈਮਰਿਜਾਉ।, which just shows that we should do Simran.

Lastly, even if you ignore all of this and you want to say that ।ਰਾਮੁਰਾਮੁਕਰਤਾਸਭੁਜਗੁਫਿਰੈਰਾਮੁਨਪਾਇਆਜਾਇ। means that by doing Simran does nothing, then how do you explain the thousands of references in Gurbani that say we should do Simran?

Youtube is full of these kind of Radio Channels who just talk behind wallpapers and never show their face. In this FB link it shows wallpaper of Radio Newzealand 107 but one cannot be sure of it. They mislead with these kind of wallpapers by running various channels. But the fact is all such stuff originates from same HQ which is in Nagpur.

Gurbani says:

ਬਾਰੰ ਬਾਰ ਬਾਰ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਜਪੀਐ ॥

ਰਸਨਾ ਜਪੈ ਨ ਨਾਮੁ ਤਿਲੁ ਤਿਲੁ ਕਰਿ ਕਟੀਐ ॥

ਆ ਦੇਖੋ ਜੀ ਇਸਨੂੰ ਕੋਈ ਕੁਝ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਹਿੰਦਾ, ਨਾਮ ਦੇ ਉਲਟ ਬੋਲੀ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਨੇ ਅਜਕਲ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਚਾਰਕ ||


[www.facebook.com]

ਅਜ ਦੇ ਉਗੇ ਪ੍ਰਚਾਰਕ ਤੇ ਸੰਗਤ ਦੇ ਜੈਕਾਰੇ -)

[www.facebook.com]

ਆਵਾ ਹੀ ਊਤਿਆ ਪਿਆ। ਪਰਚਾਰਕਾਂ ਦਾ ਵੀ ਬੁਰਾ ਹੀ ਹਾਲ ਹੈ। ਉਹਨਾਂ ਦਾ ਅਮਲੀ ਜੀਵਨ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ ਜਿਸ ਕਰਕੇ ਇਧਰ ਉਧਰ ਦੀਆਂ ਯਭਲੀਆਂ ਮਾਰ ਕੇ ਸਮਾਂ ਕਢ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ ਅਤੇ ਸੰਗਤਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਕੋਈ ਠੋਸ ਆਤਮਕ ਸੇਧ ਨਹੀਂ ਦਿੰਦੇ।

ਕੁਲਬੀਰ ਸਿੰਘ

Apologies Off the topic.

A Gursikh Veer met me a few weeks ago and he started discussing who put the Pataseh in the First ever Amrit Sanchaar, he has heard Bhaee Pinderpal Singh has done research from 3 different Granths and found out that it was not Mata Sahib Kaur who put the Pataseh in, but Bibi Ajeet Kaur.

I found it interesting as we have been told it has always been Mata Sahib Kaur and that's when she was given the status as Mother of the Khalsa also.

Quote
Vista
A Gursikh Veer met me a few weeks ago and he started discussing who put the Pataseh in the First ever Amrit Sanchaar, he has heard Bhaee Pinderpal Singh has done research from 3 different Granths and found out that it was not Mata Sahib Kaur who put the Pataseh in, but Bibi Ajeet Kaur.

Ya, this is yet another thing which Missionary folks keep bringing up every now & then these days.

Bhul Chuk Maaf.

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa,
Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh.

Quote

A Gursikh Veer met me a few weeks ago and he started discussing who put the Pataseh in the First ever Amrit Sanchaar, he has heard Bhaee Pinderpal Singh has done research from 3 different Granths and found out that it was not Mata Sahib Kaur who put the Pataseh in, but Bibi Ajeet Kaur.

I found it interesting as we have been told it has always been Mata Sahib Kaur and that's when she was given the status as Mother of the Khalsa also.

Pataaseh were put in Amrit by none other than Siri Guru Gobind Singh jee Himself. Who else could have dared to intercept and interrupt the ceremony of Amrit and put Pataaseh in when Guru Sahib Himself had not put?

Putting Pataaseh in Amrit, when Guru Sahib Himself had not put, implicitly means that the ceremony that Guru Sahib was working on, was incomplete. This is a blasphemy! So Pataaseh were put by Guru Sahib and no one else.

Kulbir Singh

Quote

Pataaseh were put in Amrit by none other than Siri Guru Gobind Singh jee Himself. Who else could have dared to intercept and interrupt the ceremony of Amrit and put Pataaseh in when Guru Sahib Himself had no put?

Putting Pataaseh in Amrit, when Guru Sahib Himself had not put, implicitly means that the ceremony that Guru Sahib was working on, was incomplete. This is a blasphemy! So Pataaseh were put by Guru Sahib and no one else.

Kulbir Singh

Exactly, Pataaseh had to have been put in by Guru Sahib Himself otherwise there would have been a Maryada that a Bibi would have to come and put in the Pataaseh rather than how it is done now where the Panj Pyare put the Pataaseh in.

Preetam Singh