ਸਤਿਗੁਰਬਚਨਕਮਾਵਣੇਸਚਾਏਹੁਵੀਚਾਰੁ॥
Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Nitish Kumar’s refusal to cover head at Patna gurudwara leaves Sikh community fuming

Posted by Mehtab Singh 
Patna: Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar on Thursday raked up a controversy after he did not cover his head inside Bal Leela Gurudwara. Kumar's refusal to cover his head irked the Sikh community that accorded him a grand reception at the gurudwara.

According to reports, Nitish Kumar was invited to inaugurate a rest house at the Bal Leela Gurudwara. He was requested to cover his head before entering the gurudwara premises, which is a strict protocol of the Sikh community.

Nitish flatly refused to oblige citing poor health as a reason. Nitish entered the premises without his head covered.

[daily.bhaskar.com]

Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Bihar CM Nitish Kumar has stoked a controversy after he refused to cover his bare head inside a gurudwara on Thursday evening. Nitish had gone to Bal Leela Gurudwara to inaugurate a six-storied rest house. Nitish was accorded a grand reception by the Sikh community at his visit to the gurudwara but when the chief minister was requested to cover his head before entering the gurudwara premises, which is a strict protocol in the Sikh community, Nitish flatly refused to oblige citing poor health as a reason. Nitish entered the premises without his head covered.

The Gurudwara Parbandhak Committee after the visit of Nitish had expressed its anger at the incident claiming that Bihar CM had disrespected their "Guru". Sardar Charanjeet Singh, general secretary, Takht Sri Harminder Singh Ji Gurudwara Committee said, "Whoever comes to gurudwara has to cover his head. Nitish should have covered his head. When he was asked to cover his head, Nitish said that he was unwell and could not cover his head. He, therefore, hurriedly inaugurated the rest house and left. It's a violation of the Sikh community protocol."

The opposition too got enough ammunition to criticise Nitish for his act. The BJP slammed him questioning his secular credentials. The party said that since Sikh community did not form a major chunk of Nitish's vote bank in Bihar, he therefore did not care about hurting sentiments of Sikh community. Senior BJP leader Giriraj Singh, speaking to Headlines Today-Aaj Tak, said that had it been an event of the Muslims, Nitish would have very easily wore a skull cap. Charging Nitish of double speaking on issue of secularism, Singh demanded an unconditional apology from Nitish for his act.

Singh said, "Nitish is a person of dual character. He attacked Narendra Modi at one point of time saying that leaders have to don a topi and tilak at the same time. At mosques he has no aversion in wearing a skull cap and clicking pictures with Muslims but at gurudwara he did not cover his head despite Sikh leaders asking him to do so. He is feigning secularism. Had Sikh been 15 per cent in Bihar he would have no problem in covering his head. Nitish is doing all drama. Nitish should apologise to Sikh community."

Sikh community in Patna city area has claimed that the act of Nitish was in complete violation of the protocol and protested in the area on Friday.

[indiatoday.intoday.in]
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
What a rascal! A scoundrel!
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
VAHEGURU JI KA KHALSA, VAHEGURU JI KI FATEH

If he was feeling unwell before, he's really not going to be feeling well now. People go to Guru Sahib with sharda and get cured. Those who defy and are obstinate - they get what is coming to them.
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
only in INDIA such worms live and prosper big time under india's brahmin rule which has always opposed Sikhe.
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Perhaps we should point the finger at ourselves as a start. Gurdwara Baal Leela is under Takht Patna Sahib management.

Why did the parbandaks** call a Nigura/ "politician" inaugurate the rest house instead of Panj Piarey or gurmukhs with contribution to panth ?


4 replies and alllllll blame either India or Hindu in one way or another.
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Why invite such a pest to our Pavitr Gurdwara ji?
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Excellent point Guruvah...he did that on purpose, because of us not supporting issue of USA Indian diplomat ji...
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Where is the Anakh of the Gurdwara committee and where were they at the time? They or at least the Sangat should have forced this moorakh out of the Guru Ghar immediately upon his refusal to comply instead of complaining after the event.
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
He should have been kicked out!
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Why do they even invite these politicians to the Gurdwara. Politicians are the biggest chors in India
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Kumar should sent him back without anger .
Bhai sahib tell if he does not respect the protocol of Sikh belief . He should
Not be allowed to take part
Upkar& gurdip
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Nitish belongs to Kurmi caste , he is not a brahmin. Power ego does not corrupt just brahmins or hindus or muslims. Human vices do not need reason , they need opportunity.
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Even emperor Akbar who was the king of India had to respect protocols of the Gurdwara. Then who is this Nitish Kumar to disrespect Sikh traditions. The Gurdwara committee should have had more self respect.
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login