Rattan Mala? May 20, 2013 05:54PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 20, 2013 06:41PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 20, 2013 07:59PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 21, 2013 04:21AM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 21, 2013 02:52PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 22, 2013 02:23AM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 22, 2013 10:41AM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 22, 2013 12:52PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 22, 2013 03:05PM |
Quote
As far as I know, Ratan Maala was written by Udasis (perhaps by Anand Ghann) along with other compositions which the 3rd Guru Sahib rejected as “kachi bani”. Udasi was the only group composing kachi bani at the time. It talks about yoga.
Hakikat Rah Mukaam describes the journey of a Sikh (not Paira Mokha who was already dead by the time) to Sri Lanka to obtain Pran Sangali which was attributed to Guru Nanak Dev Ji. When Guru Arjan Dev Ji acquired it he rejected it as faulty due to it being unauthentic or being altered and diluted. As far as I know, Pran Sangali is not one of the kachi banis included in some puratan saroops but Hakikat Rah Mukaam is.
Jitt Dar Likh Muhammada was written by Meharbaan praising Mohammad just like he wrote compositions praising Rama and Krishna.
Siahi Ki Bidh found in many saroops is not a composition but an ink formula. Other than this, I can’t provide any more information.
Re: Rattan Mala? May 22, 2013 07:51PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 23, 2013 05:27AM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 23, 2013 12:02PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 23, 2013 12:39PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 23, 2013 06:25PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 24, 2013 08:02AM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 24, 2013 11:00AM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 25, 2013 04:46AM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 25, 2013 06:01AM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 25, 2013 10:15AM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 25, 2013 10:15AM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 25, 2013 12:57PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 25, 2013 01:08PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 25, 2013 01:47PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 25, 2013 06:57PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 26, 2013 12:33AM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 26, 2013 12:13PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 26, 2013 12:28PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 26, 2013 07:58PM |
Quote
The subject matter is Bhagti and redefining Hatha Yoga. The teaching or the Updesh is definitely good but I fear that if this composition is part of the Meena literature (Meena means anything related to Prithi Chand and his successors), then reading this composition would be like doing Sangat of these Bemukh people and it can have adverse affect on us as per this Pankiti:
Re: Rattan Mala? May 26, 2013 09:34PM |
Re: Rattan Mala? May 27, 2013 08:40AM |
Quote
This weekend I had the opportunity to review all of Rattan Mala, and after reviewing its contents I cant understand why you assume it was written by someone like the Meenas or perhaps Bijla Singh Ji can explain why he thinks the Udasis? Could you exlplain why you assume the Meenas have written this bani. I could not find any pangti which seemed to propagate manmat nor can I find any reference to Sri Chand or Prithi Chand.