ਸਤਿਗੁਰਬਚਨਕਮਾਵਣੇਸਚਾਏਹੁਵੀਚਾਰੁ॥
Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Sangats view on "sant smaaj"

Posted by mahamoorkh 
Sangats view on "sant smaaj"
September 04, 2011 07:02PM
Sangat Jee daas is thick and dumb and wants your opinion.

Should there be such group called sant smaaj. A true sant is one who jaaps more than athe pehar naam, but would a sant truly want to show this avasta by joining sant smaaj. Also by joining sant smaaj, one must think one is a sant, but wouldn't a true sant think he is lowest of the low and not worthy.

Sangat please give your views, as Khalsa raaj is approaching in the future, such veechars are needed for chardi kala of the panth.

Daas Papi
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Like most groups Sant Samjh had a humble upbringing . It was started
by many Gurmukhs like Sant ISher SIngh Ji ( Rara Sahib) Giani Gurbachan SIngh ji ( Bindra)
Sant Attar SIngh Ji ( Mastuna) etc who did massive amounts of parchar to combat the
arya samajhist who were bent on destroying SIkhi. However; just like other SIkh groups
the organization eventually got into the hand of some manmukh politicians and now it really
doesnt do much for Gurmat.
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
In regards to the name Sant Samajh I see no harm in this name it would be like having
an organization called Khalsa Samajh or GUrmukh Samajh . THe word Sant, Khalsa, and
Gurmukh all mean the same thing.

In regards to calling a Gurmukh sant there is no harm in this as well. Guru Sahib refers
to Bhagat Prahlaad as Sant, and in rehatnamey BHai Nand Lal says not to cause any harm to
a "Sikh Sant". Also, In his book Ranglee Sajan , BHai
Randhir SIngh Ji refer to some Gurmukhs as Sant.
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login