In daas's opinion Naam should be kept as gupt as possible.
However it seems that is only opinion of minority including Gursikhs in jatha. Daas was going to write something in regards to the rise of simran programs especially here in the UK. Daas believes the rise of simran programs are an offshoot of simran done at rainsbais. However reading about smagams in puratan times and from puratan Gursikhs, dhunee (simran) was rare.
One problem with simran programmes is that many non-amritdhari attend. The non-amritdhari who go to these programmes may get wrong impression and feel that they have done simran and therefore taking is amrit is not mandatory. In reality, Naam can only be recieved from Panj Piare.
For sure there is lots of simran being done at gurdwaras and rainbais but daas feels that the tatt is not present. Also I do not see this trend reversing.
Some may suggest that they enjoy simran at rainbais and can't do without. However, puratan Gursikhs used to both together. When doing kirtan or paath the khanda of Naam would also reside (inside).
Daas has no authority or kamai to write about such lofty topics but 100% agrees with bhai kulbir singh jee. To have any sort of abhiyaas of naam we must have heavy abhiyaas of Gurbanee. When we do parchaar we must insist on heavy abhiyaas of Gurbanee. An abhiyaasi of Gurbanee will become an abhiyaasi of Naam especially if they have naam drir.
Bhul chuk maaf jee.