" ਬਹੁਤੇ ਪਿੰਡਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਜੋ ਗੁਰਦੁਆਰਾ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੇ ਗ੍ਰੰਥੀ ਸਿੰਘ ਹਨ ਓਹ ਗੁਰੂ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੇ ਲੜੀਵਾਰ ਸਰੂਪ ਨਹੀਂ ਪੜ੍ਹਨੇ ਆਉਂਦੇ ਹੋਣ ਕਰਕੇ ਬਿਰਧ ਹੋਣ ਦਾ ਬਹਾਨਾ ਲਾਕੇ ਸੰਸਕਾਰ ਲਈ ਭੇਜ ਰਹੇ ਹਨ |ਪ੍ਰੰਤੂ ਜੋ ਗੁਟਕਾ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਹਨ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਬਾਰੇ ਦਾਸ ਹਜੇ ਵੀ ਦ੍ਰਿੜ੍ਹ ਹੈ ਕੀ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਵਿਚ ਅਖੌਤੀ ਡੇਰਿਆਂ ਵਲੋਂ ਲਖਾਂ ਕਰੋੜਾਂ ਦੀ ਤਾਦਾਦ ਵਿਚ ਛਾਪੇ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ ਜੋ ਆਪਣੇ ਚੇਲਿਆਂ ਵਿਚ ਆਪਣੇ ਡੇਰੇ ਦੀ ਆਮਦਨ ਦਾ ਸਰੋਤ ਬਣਾਕੇ ਵੰਡੇ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ ਤੇ ਜੋ ਬਾਅਦ ਵਿਚ ਬਿਲਕੁਲ ਨਵੀਂ ਹਾਲਤ ਵਿਚ ਇਥੋਂ ਤਕ ਕਈ ਤਾਂ ਇਕ ਦੋ ਵਾਰ ਹੀ ਪੜ੍ਹੇ ਹੁੰਦੇ ਹਨ ਸੰਸਕਾਰ ਲਈ ਪਹੁੰਚ ਰਹੇ ਹਨ "
Veer Harsh Singh Jee, it is a request to you again and again to please do your complete research and I mean COMPLETE research before you make such statements. You had said yourself that,"ਜੋ ਅਖੀਂ ਡਿਠਾ ਉਹ ਬਿਆਨ ਕਰਤਾ". But Veerji I am sorry to say but what you saw is not everything. From my understanding, it seems as if you may have attended the actual day of the sewa and based on just that, you are making invalid and false assumptions that are not entirely true. It is clear that you have not seen the sewa that is ongoing everyday in PREPARATION of the sewa day.
The first part of your statement may be true about gutke sahib and larivaar saroops however you are mistaken to be connecting that discussion to the actual agan bhet sewa that Bhai Narinder Singh Jee hosts. Bhai Sahib Jee along with other sewadaars that monitor saroops and gutke sahib etc. brought to the isthaan are simply told by the sangat that these articles are "birdh" and they leave those articles at the isthaans. It is unknown with what intentions the sangat has brought those saroops and gutke sahib etc. In the statements you are making you are explaining your views as to what these intentions may be by which sangat brings such articles to the isthaan whether it is because they cannot read larivaar saroops or whether sangat read from new gutke sahib for a small period of time and then dont want them anymore. However, you need to understand that EVERYTHING, AS IN ALL ARTICLES THAT ARE RETRIEVED AT THESE ISTHAANS ARE NOT...NOT AGAN BHET. PLEASE UNDERSTAND THIS. The statement you made which ends with ..... ਸੰਸਕਾਰ ਲਈ ਪਹੁੰਚ ਰਹੇ ਹਨ is giving the sangat the wrong message that all articles of gurbani that end up at these isthaans are agan bhet when that is completely NOT true.
Once again, I am going to reiterate that all Saroops of Shri Guru Granth Sahib Jee regardless of their type (larivaar or not) are all treated in the same manner. Prior to the day of the sewa, sewadaars do darshan of all saroops that arrive at the isthaans 3 TIMES and detailed notes are taken. During that process, many key points are kept in mind, for example, the condition of the binding, the condition of the aangs etc. Please understand that during this process Guru Jee's saroops are NEVER evaluated as to whether it is larivaar or not. They are simply evaluated for their physical condition and whether they are in decent condition to be given out free to the sangat without any bheta. If they are not in great condition however, can be repaired, the sewadaars work to rebuild the binding as well as insert new aangs that can be replaced. Once these saroops are repaired they are again sent out to the sangat for free. This repairing sewa is done to ALL types of saroops INCLUDING larivaar saroops. So in terms of your concern, if sangat did bring good condition larivaar saroops to the isthaan and do not want them for whatever reason, THEY ARE NOT AGAN BHET. RATHER, THEY ARE GIVEN OUT FOR FREE TO SANGAT MEMBERS THAT WISH TO HAVE THEM AND ARE WILLING TO READ AND DO PROPER SEWA.
Further, in addressing you point on gutke sahib, please understand that similarly good condition gutke sahib, pothis, gurbani literature etc. are NEVER AGAN BHET. Instead, all good condition articles are set out in stalls and are given out free to sangat that wish to have them. This stall is always set out and sangat is welcome to come anytime to get gutke sahib, pothis etc. In relation to your concern, if certain individuals brought new gutke sahib to the isthaan because they do not want them no more and they are definitely not birdh then they are NEVER agan bhet because they can be read by other sangat members that wish to have them and will read them.
I hope I have made myself clear Veerji. The terms and statements you are making are not entirely legitimate. Please watch this video to understand that nothing I have said is made up and only the truth. if you are saying that you are only saying what you saw, ("ਜੋ ਅਖੀਂ ਡਿਠਾ ਉਹ ਬਿਆਨ ਕਰਤਾ") then I can confidently say that what I have said is what I saw and have been seeing for the past 9years. Obviously there is a clear discrepancy between our viewpoints in certain terms however, I am confident that you have simply not done enough research.
[
www.youtube.com]
ਸਤਿਗੁਰਬਚਨਕਮਾਵਣੇਸਚਾਏਹੁਵੀਚਾਰੁ॥