Discrimination against Sikhs

Proof of Discrimination against Sikhs

"To preserve the unity of India, if we have to eradicate 2-karor (20 million) sikhs, we will do so" (Balram Jhakhar, Member of Indian Parliament & friend of former Prime Minister Narsimharao)

"The Sikhs are lawless people and a menace to the law abiding Hindus. The governement should take strict action against them" (Pandit Nehru, Indian Prime Minister, on Sikhs.

"Kya main taqat dushman" (the enemy-the Sikhs)ke haath main de dun" (How can I entrust power into the hands of the enemies). (Jawahar Lal Nehru, 1961)

"I hate the very physique of a Sikh because of the turban and beard" (Vallabh Bhai Patel, Late Top Indian Politician)

"I don't give a damn if the Golden Temple and the whole of Amritsar is destroyed, I want Bhindranwale dead" (Indira Gandhi, communicating to General Vaidya during operation Bluestar)

"We have broken the backs of the Sikhs and we will get them elsewhere" (M.M.K Wali, Indian Foreign Secretary, June 7th on the radio)

"Let us teach these b****** (the sikhs) a lesson" (Rajiv Gandhi, October 31 (1984). This was said to instigate the riots following Indira Gandh'is death which killed 20,000 sikhs.)

"You do not know the might of our armed forces. We will eliminate 10,000 sikh youths and the world will know nothing of it" (Chander Shekhar, former Prime Minister of India, 1991)

The Army stated in it’s publication, known as ‘baat cheet’ or talking points, that any baptised Sikh (bearded) was effectively a terrorist. It blamed Guru Gobind Singh for militancy among Sikhs and to all intents & purposes waged war on him personally. (Baat Cheet Paper)

Under the TADA law of in Punjab. Anyone even suspected of militant activity can be executed without trial or charge. What is the description of a terrorist in the eyes of the Indian Govt. "Anyone who wears a gatra and read's Nanaks BaNee is a terrorist".



I shall not hesitate. Last night I humbly said to the young men that first I have to tell them that we are slaves. No matter how much we talk, no matter how much we boast, until it is ingrained in the mind of every son of a Sikh, of every old man, of every mother and sister, that we are slaves, we shall not be able to throw off the yoke of slavery and achieve freedom. Freedom from slavery is achieved only when a person starts to feel and understand that he would prefer death to life as a slave; when he does not consider living (as a slave) worthwhile. Only then one gets rid of slavery, never otherwise.

Sant Jarnail Singh jee - September 20, 1983

India has been able to secretly continue its discrimination against Sikhs as the extremist hindus have political power so it is easy for them to hide their actions from the world against sikhs. It is similar to Europeans (British, France, white Americans) who killed thousands of thousands of Native Americans (Indians) to wipe them completely out from Canada and America, as those in power made it legal to kill Indians - "From 1850 to 1900 it was legal, and even a sick sport to kill Indians. Hundreds of thousands were killed, entire tribes were destroyed, the ones who numbered tens of thousands were reduced to mere hundreds." This happened during the California Gold Rush where 100,000 California Indians were killed between 1848 and 1868 and it carried on systematically by the white americans.

Due to the Indian Government's pride and tyranny, their rule will be finished soon, very soon.

Very true words, so we have to have faith that Gurujio uprooted Moghul rule from India due to their tyranny. Same goes with current tyrants, but remember traitor Sikhs amongst them, because Gursikhi is an individual blessing from Gurujio, so dubda see blessed as enemies, regardless if blessed is family member, as Guru Nanak Dev's son, as well as Guru Har Gobind's son.
Bhul chuk maf

ks Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> regardless if
> blessed is family member, as Guru Nanak Dev's son,
> as well as Guru Har Gobind's son.
> Bhul chuk maf

Dear ks jee,
Lets not point fingers to any Guru Jee's direct family member (son or else) and what those family member did. Whatever happened, during that Guru Jee's time, was all under the Akal Purakh's Hukam. In 21st century we don't know under what circumstances the incidents happened. We should not pass judgements on who did what.

All the past incidents happened because it was all Guru Jee's Kautak to convey a beautiful message to all of us. The message in simple words is, For example,
1. By taking birth in Doctor's house the child cannot be by default called as Doctor. The child has to study rigoursly, give exams, practice and then only becomes qualified to be called Doctor.
2. Same is the case with Painter. By taking birth in Painter's home the child cannot be called Artist (painter). The child has to learn the language of colors, the child has to practice and develop his/her own imagination. Once the child had found and starts spreading his/her own inner magic on canvas then only child be called Artist.

Similary, Guru Jee wanted us to know that by taking birth in Sikh family the child may not be called Sikh. It is a blessing given by Akal Purakh to the child by allowing him/her to take birth in Sikh family. Now it depends on the child to earn Sikhi or waste his/her life. Sikhi has to be earned it cannot be given on platter (may be if Guru Jee wish He can give us Sikhi on platter as well .... it has happened in past .... people who licked the feet of Shri Guru Nanak Dev Ji's became Brahmgyani instantly even less than a second .... this is what it is going to happen in Khalsa Raj .... You take a dip Shri Harmandar Sahib Sarovar and you become Brahmgyani.... ).

Jaskiratji,
My point exactly, and thank-you for reiterating it.
Five fingers serve different purpose, and how blessed they are dependent on Guru's Hukam on preordained destiny
Bhul chuk muaf.

Here is very sad proof of double standard of our own traitor dubdey sikhs; Manmohan Singh's daughter defending Musalman detainees in US, while her father endorses torture, hanging, and butchering of Sikh Saints>

[www.rediff.com]

Maybe, father and daughter don't see eye to eye, which is why she is in US, defending Muslim terrorists?

Waheguru