ਸਤਿਗੁਰਬਚਨਕਮਾਵਣੇਸਚਾਏਹੁਵੀਚਾਰੁ॥
Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

U.S. Census 2010

Posted by JASJIT SINGH 
U.S. Census 2010
March 24, 2010 09:25AM
Press Release

Write-In “Sikh” in the “Other Race” category for Question 9 on the 2010 Census Form

The campaign undertaken by UNITED SIKHS and other Sikh organizations to get Sikhs counted and disaggregated correctly has received overwhelming support from community leaders and members of the Sikh community. We urge all Sikhs, as an ethnic group in the United States, to make visible our presence as an integral part of the economic, social, civic and cultural fabric of the country by filling out the Census form, by marking “Some Other Race,” and writing in “Sikh.”
Many organizations and gurdwaras (Sikh places of worship) around the country have lent their support to the campaign by organizing awareness meetings in the community, in addition to the formation of several Sikh Complete Count Committees. The government uses Census data to allocate resources, drawing districts for political representation, and determining what areas require special assistance. You can review the petition and supporting academic paper at: [www.unitedsikhs.org]. Have questions? Review the FAQ and feel free to contact us.
Isn’t Sikhism a religion, not a race?
Beyond being recognized for our faith, Sikhs are recognized as an ethnic group in many countries owing to their distinct identity and idea of the “kaum.” We have a distinct language (Gurmukhi script), religion, marriage, festivals, appearance, and other cultural variances; important factors that qualify Sikhs as an ethnic group. There are Sikhs who are of different colors and races that would like to be coded as Sikhs, for if you ask them their identity, their response does not include Black, White, Indian or Chinese; rather they say “I am a Sikh.” When people see us, they don't think about our skin color first, they think about what we appear to be otherwise.
You recently released a press release saying we are not getting a separate code for 2010 Census, but may in the future. Why bother now?
The Census Bureau informed us that they could not assign a code for this Census, but that, “Beyond the 2010 Census, we will consider changes to the processing of the term “Sikh” when it is provided in response to the question on race.” It is very important for Sikhs to write-in and identify themselves. In addition to increased visibility, it strengthens our case by sending a strong message that we want to be counted separately, and this is something we want as a community. Also, in previous counts, other ethnic groups have been counted separately if they have substantial write-ins. Even if we do not have a separate code, the write-in forms will be retained and the Census Bureau will review the data. Also, the forms become a part of national historical data and are made public after 72 years. Obtaining a code will impact other key demographic surveys administered by the government like the Annual American Community Survey, which also currently codes Sikhs as Asian Indian. This campaign is for now, and our future generations.
For more answers to frequently asked questions, review the FAQ. Still have unanswered questions or doubts about the Census form? Email them to law-usa@unitedsikhs.org.
Do your part! Fill out the form, mark “Sikh” in the “Other Race” category for Q: 9

You can see previous Census related press releases at [www.unitedsikhs.org]
Issued by:
Jaspreet Singh
Staff Attorney
UNITED SIKHS
(646) 315-3909
law-usa@unitedsikhs.org
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Re: U.S. Census 2010
March 24, 2010 09:42AM
alternate opinion:

[sikhcoalition.wordpress.com]

Over the past few weeks, the Coalition has received varied requests for our involvement with Census 2010 efforts across the United States. Next year’s census count promises to be one of the largest mobilizing events of this administration. But the Sikh Coalition has decided not to play an active role in the Census next year for the reason described below.


Like most Sikhs, we would like for there to be an accurate count of Sikhs in the United States. If we had an accurate count of how many Sikhs live in the United States and where, we would gain many advantages – from being able to showcase voting blocks in certain areas to obtaining funding for our community’s needs. Every time we walk into a legislator’s office to ask them to do something for Sikhs, the first question is always “How many Sikhs are there in my district.” Therefore, having an accurate count of our community is key to our progress in the United States.

However, after months of research into this matter, we have discovered that Census 2010 will not be able to provide us with any Sikh headcount at all. This is the primary reason why the Coalition has chosen not to play an active role in the census effort next year.

We recently spoke with Karen Humes, Assistant Division Chief for Special Populations at the Census Bureau in Washington, DC. Karen’s job is to work alongside the Race and Ancestry branches to code the data that comes in on census forms from around the country. You can read a letter from Karen that confirms this information by clicking here.

There are 4 options for how a Sikh could possibly fill out the 2010 census form to try and be counted as a Sikh. Each of these options involves Question 9 – The Race Question – on the census form. Here’s what Karen told us about each one:

Option 1: Under the question “What is Person 1’s race?,” a Sikh could tick the box next to either “Other Asian” or “Some other race” and write in the word “Sikh” in the text space.

Karen was very clear that any attempt to write in the word “Sikh” in any text box on the census form will result in the person being counted as “Asian Indian.” As she explained it, the census’ computers are coded so that any write-in of the word “Sikh” results in the person automatically being dropped into the “Asian Indian” category. There is no “Sikh” category.

Option 2: Under the question “What is Person 1’s race?,” a Sikh could tick the box next to both “Asian Indian” and “Some other race” and write in the word “Sikh” in the text space.

If more than one type of race box is ticked, the person will be counted as someone of mixed-race heritage. If the person ticks both and writes in “Sikh” under “Some other race” then the person will be counted as mixed-race of Asian heritage.

Option 3: Under the question “What is Person 1’s race?,” a Sikh could simply tick the box next to “Some other race” or “Other Asian” and not write anything in the text space.

In this case, the Sikh would simply be counted as “Other Asian” or “Other race,” which are both reported categories in the Census data.

Option 4: A Sikh could leave the question “What is Person 1’s race?” unanswered on the census form.

If the race question is left unanswered, the Census Bureau will attempt to impute a race based on other information. For example, they will check back to match your return from Census 2000, if possible, or will check the race of others in your household. If all else fails, they could impute your neighbor’s race to you with the help of a stratification algorithm.

In sum, the message from Census Bureau officials is clear: There is no Sikh category that it counts and writing in the word “Sikh” under the race questions will have Sikhs counted as “Asian Indian.”

The Census Bureau has also stated that it will not reconsider the decision not to include Sikhs in its census count because it does not traditionally include any religious categories in the census.

The Coalition will always support efforts to get Sikhs counted in the United States. That is partly why we are doing further research into the American Community Survey (ACS) – a yearly data collection process by the Census Bureau that counts people by religious affiliation across the country. Our understanding is that the ACS provides more accurate data than the census and focuses on more socio-economic categories than the census. We have been told that some versions of the ACS, unlike the Census, also have a specific question about religion, which we believe would more accurately reflect the number of Sikhs in our community. We will be looking into this over the next few months and will let the community know the results of our research.

In sum, while the census is a grand effort being put forth by the government next year, the Coalition believes it would be best for us to spend the Sikh community’s money on an initiative that benefits the Sikh community specifically. Because the census does not provide us with a headcount of Sikhs, we currently believe that the best way to spend our resources to try and get a Sikh headcount is to work with the ACS and not the census.
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Re: U.S. Census 2010
March 24, 2010 11:56AM
Guru Piyare Bibi jio,

Waheguru ji ka Khalsa, Waheguru ji ki Fateh

Up until yesterday daas was in great confusion what to do now because census forms are arrived home. Since last 8 years or so daas worked very closely with both organizations in fact Sikh Coalition came out of Sept. 911 and similarly United Sikhs became active since then. From bottom of my heart daas respect the contribution they made on U. S. soil. Even today on most issues in U. S. we closely work with both for example in fields of Education and law enforcement. Although daas can not speak on their behalf but as I worked closely with them so I must say that this is the very first time that daas observed there is little bit Asynchronization (do not know if this appropriate word but technically this is what I observed) among these origination on this issue. However, for 2020 census they petitioned jointly to have separate category for SIKH on the census forms. So, for future goal their consensus are same but for current situation which needed to resolve ASAP both have little bit different approach. One just divert it’s resources to continue other projects which is clear from this final summary of Sikh Coalition:
Quote
“In sum, while the census is a grand effort being put forth by the government next year, the Coalition believes it would be best for us to spend the Sikh community’s money on an initiative that benefits the Sikh community specifically. Because the census does not provide us with a headcount of Sikhs, we currently believe that the best way to spend our resources to try and get a Sikh headcount is to work with the ACS and not the census.”
But they are not saying that not to write Sikh on other category or they are against it, all they are saying is because they do not see the perspective for this year’s count because Sikhs will be counted as Asian-Indians anyway, so they will just focus on other issues, while United Sikhs is continuing this voice.

Yesterday, I have discussed this matter with Director of United Sikhs of American region and just for the sake of aligning and residing by community’s thought no matter results are good or bad daas decided to go ahead with this.

Dead line date is mid night April 1, 2010. Please send your forms ASAP to be counted.

With Regards,
Daas
Jasjit Singh
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Re: U.S. Census 2010
March 24, 2010 02:14PM
bhai sahib, my main concern is that for sikhs of non-asian descent, we will be counted incorrectly.

i hope they remedy this in future census forms.

(i wound up checking "white" AND writing sikh in the "other" box.)

oh, did you notice that the census site is available in punjabi? smiling smiley

[2010.census.gov]
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Re: U.S. Census 2010
March 24, 2010 04:06PM
Guru Piyare Bibi jio,

Your concern is valid and unfortunately daas do not have answer at this point but surely I will discuss with them whenever there will be a talk. May be they already have this concern under consideration because there are handful numbers of non-Indian decent Sikhs in U.S. As far as Punjabi goes it is good to see the recognition at that government level but still lot of work and effort needed to go further. Sept. 911 also gave the wake up call to all Sikh Americans but unfortunately many are still sleeping. With Guru Sahib's grace Khalsa is in Chardi Kala and soon it will be victories in many fields. Especially in the field of Education there is lot of misconception about Sikhs. Either there is no mentioning of Sikhs or if there is that is very negative. Sangat will be surprised to know that while in the trail of school presentations a history teacher showed this daas a world history text book very smilingly to let me know that word Sikhs are mentioned in that book, with curiosity and excitement I looked at that page guess what ‘Sikhs’ word was written twice that “Sikhs killed their prime minister Indira Gandhi” and secondly “because Sikhs had tension with her due to separate State” and some thing like this. Hard to believe that kind of introduction is there. What is the point of this kind of introduction of Sikhs? Who brought it in? Such questions came to my mind at very instant. It shows there are some anti-Sikh elements in Education society of America who intentionally sowed these prickles. Khalsa will never sit back with Guru Sahib’s kirpa some Sikhs are working with their best of ability to overcome these hindrances. This is only possible if more Singh/Singhnia join this convoy. Future is bright but it is at far distance.

Above all it is under Guru Sahib’s will what to do with his Panth and as a humble Sikh all we can do is just Ardaas for Chardi kala.

With Regards,
Daas
Jasjit Singh
Reply Quote TweetFacebook
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login